GC–MS

Latest News

Best of the Week: Pittcon Returns to Pittsburgh, Advancing Science Through Diversity
Best of the Week: Pittcon Returns to Pittsburgh, Advancing Science Through Diversity

March 28th 2025

Here is some of the most popular content posted on LCGC International this week.

Microplastics Laboratory Analysis | Image Credit: © Microgen - stock.adobe.com
Quantifying Microplastics in Meconium Samples Using Pyrolysis–GC-MS

March 26th 2025

The Role of SPME Combined with GC–MS for PFAS Analysis
The Role of SPME Combined with GC–MS for PFAS Analysis

March 25th 2025

Low-angle view of a skyscraper with neon accents disappearing into fog © Bianca - stock.adobe.comLow-angle view of a skyscraper with neon accents disappearing into fog © Bianca - stock.adobe.com
When Home and Office Hurt Your Health

March 21st 2025

Best of the Week: Waters Executives Discuss Goals for 2025, Inside the Laboratory, North Carolina PFAST Network
Best of the Week: Waters Executives Discuss Goals for 2025, Inside the Laboratory, North Carolina PFAST Network

March 14th 2025

More News


Halpenny-figures-1_web.jpg

Analysis of Terpenes in Cannabis Using Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction and GC–MS

May 1st 2017

As the legalization of medicinal cannabis continues to sweep across the United States, an urgent need has developed for fast, accurate and efficient analytical testing. In addition to testing for contaminants and potency, there is also interest in the determination of terpene identity and concentration levels present in different strains of cannabis. Terpenes have been shown to have therapeutic uses for treatment of different medical conditions ranging from cancer and inflammation, to anxiety and sleeplessness. It is believed that the combination of terpenes and cannabinoids in cannabis produce a synergistic effect with regards to medical benefits. The traditional testing method for terpenes in plant materials involves a solvent-based extraction followed by GC analysis. In this work, headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was used to identify and quantify terpene content in cannabis. The HS-SPME method provided several advantages over solvent extraction in that it provided a cleaner analysis, free of interferences from co-extracted matrix, and was non-destructive to the sample. A cannabis sample of unknown origin was first analyzed qualitatively by HS-SPME and GC-MS. Spectral library matching and retention indices were used to identify 42 different terpenes. Quantitative analysis was then performed for several selected terpenes using spiked samples. Method accuracy was >90%, with reproducibility of