Liquid Chromatography (LC/HPLC)

This is an exciting time for 2D-LC, as the expanding community of users works to develop creative solutions involving 2D-LC to solve analytical challenges that are very difficult or impossible to solve by conventional means.

Leading separation scientists share their perspectives on current challenges in separation science and where the field is heading.

You have to be careful when adjusting gradient conditions.

UHPLC’s benefits include fast analysis, high-resolution separations, reduced solvent and sample usage, enhanced sensitivity and precision, and more.

A surfactant based diluent was used in sample preparation for reversed phase HPLC analysis of a drug product and its impurities in a phospholipid formulation. The use of the didodecyl trimethylammonium bromide (DDAB) enabled a consistent, quantitative extraction of the analytes of interest from the lipid matrix in a much more aqueous, weak solvent. Water was added as an anti-solvent to precipitate out the surfactant from the system to eliminate HPLC injection pressure spikes, enabling large volume injections and achieving a consistent, robust method for long term use. Method development and validation steps are described.

Several variables can be used to change selectivity in a liquid chromatographic (LC) separation. Here we compare the variables in an effort to prioritize which experiments will be most effective.

A primary impediment to cannabinoid research is the fact that materials possessing psychoactive Δ-9-tetrathydrocannabinol are considered Schedule I drugs as defined in the U.S. Controlled Substances Act. An alternative source of cannabinoids may be found in hemp oil extracts. Hemp contains a low percentage of Δ-9-tetrathydrocannabinol (THC) by weight but relatively high amounts of non-psychoactive cannabinoids. The liquid chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOF) method presented herein allows for the accurate, precise and robust speciation, profiling and quantification of cannabinoids in hemp oil extracts and commercial cannabinoid products for research and development laboratories. The method was determined to chromatographically separate 11 cannabinoids including differentiation of Δ-8-tetrahdrocannabinol and THC with excellent linear dynamic range, specificity and sensitivity.

We’ll see how to find the “sweet spot” in terms of retention for a liquid chromatographic separation as well as how much retention change is to be expected for a selected change in mobile-phase percent organic or column temperature.

This installment describes HPLC and related products introduced at Pittcon 2017 Chicago and in the year prior. It highlights new HPLC systems, modules, and software, with innovative features and significant benefits to the users.

When considering column efficiency, more is not always better. We look at some ways to quickly estimate the effects of changes in column length and particle diameter rather than trying the experiments in the laboratory.

Rudolf Krska, from the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences in Vienna, Austria, talks about the latest analytical techniques and challenges facing analysts involved in the evolving field of mycotoxin analysis.

Delivering samples to the analytical column in ‘clean’ mobile phase is important for robust methods and high quality results.

The carotenoid test allows one to build a simple classification map of stationary phases used in reversed-phase liquid chromatography, on the basis of the shape recognition(plotted on the x axis) the polar surface activity(plotted on the y axis) and the phase hydrophobicity (related by the bubble size).

There is increasing demand to analyze samples with a wide range of polarities, in fields such as environmental analysis and proteomics.

We explore the careers and achievements of the winners of LCGC’s 10th annual awards: Pat Sandra and Deirdre Cabooter.

A reader’s problem of a method that fails the repeatability of the system suitability test serves as an example of how to approach LC method troubleshooting.

Part II of this series describes additional features of the HPLC Teaching Assistant software, including the possibility to simulate the impact of the mobile phase temperature on HPLC separations; understand the chromatographic behavior of a mixture of diverse compounds in both isocratic and gradient elution modes; show the influence of instrumentation (injected volume and tubing geometry) on the kinetic performance and sensitivity in HPLC; and demonstrate the impact of analyte molecular weight on thermodynamic (retention and selectivity) and kinetic (efficiency) performance.

What could be causing a peak to be eluted before the column dead time? In last month’s “LC Troubleshooting” (1) we looked at problems two readers had with ghost peaks in gradient runs. This month, we’ll continue looking at submitted questions and examine one submitted by another reader of this column.

Here we propose an exemplary workflow for the analysis of phenolic extracts (i.e. wine) enabling confident differential analysis using high performance liquid chromatography in combination with low-field drift tube ion mobility quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC×IMS-QTOFMS). In this workflow, single-field collisional cross section values from low-field drift-tube IMS using nitrogen as drift gas (DTCCSN2) are readily extracted in addition to a retention time and a high resolution mass spectrum for each compound. “Alternating frames” experiments utilizing post-drift tube fragmentation also allow drift time-aligned MS/MS spectra to be obtained. Molecular feature extraction was highly repeatable with average precision values of 0.28% for retention time, 0.18% for drift time, and 1.5 ppm m/z determined for 233 molecular features found in all six technical replicates. The improved selectivity of this strategy increases confidence in intersample molecular feature alignment (i.e. compound identity confirmation), including the resolution of co-eluting isomeric compounds.

Interfering peaks or high baseline background can compromise the results of gradient LC separations.

This article describes the development of a HPLC method for the assay of green fluorescent protein (GFPuv) in-process samples from our model therapeutic protein production process. Specificity of the method is evaluated by demonstrating a suitable HPLC method to separate and detect closely related protein degradation species.

Cartenoid compounds can be used as probes for studying the stationary bonded phases devoted for reversed-phase liquid chromatography, that is, C18, phenyl-hexyl, and cholester. From one analysis achieved in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) that favors the chromatographic behaviors due to the stationary phase properties, bonding density, ligand type (monomeric or polymeric), and endcapping treatment, two separation factors are calculated allowing us to build a bi-dimentional map. These two axes are related either to the shape selectivity or the polar surface activity (residual silalnos). Each point on the map corresponds to a column. The retention factor of beta-carotene, which describes the phase hydrophobicity, is indicated by the size of the point. More than 200 stationary phases were studied, including small particle sizes and superficially porous ones. Moreover, the results are now available on a website, allowing you to check and compare, by selecting the required tabs, columns, manufacturer brands, and ligand nature.

Fluorescence detection can be a strong alternative to ultraviolet or other detectors for some compounds.

Reversed-phase liquid chromatographic columns can be compared quantitatively for differences in selectivity by means of the hydrophobic-subtraction model. This allows selection of columns that are either equivalent or different in selectivity. The present paper both presents a summary of this approach and shows in detail how to use it in practice.

A practical step-by-step guide to setting up an HPLC instrument with hints and tips to avoid common pitfalls.

Detectors based on ultraviolet absorbance are the most common detectors in use for liquid chromatography.

There can be significant benefits by standardizing HPLC columns in a pharmaceutical development laboratory. Here is a story of how one organization attempted to encourage its staff to develop HPLC methods using fewer column brands and dimensions to reduce waste and efforts in method transfers downstream.

A reliable autosampler is one key requirement for unattended operation of a liquid chromatograph.

A simple, rapid, and robust ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of natural and artificial vanilla flavouring substances as well as some precursors has been developed using an automated method scouting or method optimization workflow. The most suitable mobile phase and stationary phase combination was identified in a scouting run. These conditions were used to create a two-dimensional model in computer simulation software. Temperature and gradient time were varied to establish the optimum fast and robust separation conditions. This approach resulted in a 5.5 min gradient method that allowed for fast screening of 11 compounds of interest.

Put yourself in their spot: How would you tackle analyzing a bag of gummy bears that showed up on your lab bench? Here, we offer some insights from the very capable finalists at The Conference on Small Molecule Science (CoSMoS), which was held in August 2015 in San Diego, California.