The Application Notebook
LC–MS-MS instruments operating in Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) are widely used for targeted quantitation on triple quadrupole and hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap (QTRAP® ) systems because of their well known selectivity and sensitivity. In MRM mode, the first quadrupole (Q1) filters a specific precursor ion; the collision cell (Q2) generates fragments (product ions) which are filtered in the third quadrupole (Q3). Although this double mass filtering greatly reduces noise there is always a chance that elevated background levels or matrix signals interfere with the targeted analyte.
LC–MS-MS instruments operating in Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) are widely used for targeted quantitation on triple quadrupole and hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap (QTRAP® ) systems because of their well known selectivity and sensitivity. In MRM mode, the first quadrupole (Q1) filters a specific precursor ion; the collision cell (Q2) generates fragments (product ions) which are filtered in the third quadrupole (Q3). Although this double mass filtering greatly reduces noise there is always a chance that elevated background levels or matrix signals interfere with the targeted analyte.
One possibility of improving quantitative results is using a more selective detection mode, such as MRM3 . When a QTRAP® System is operated in MRM3 mode first Q1 filters the first precursor ion; than Q2 generates product ions which are trapped in Q3 operating as a linear ion trap (LIT). Afterwards the LIT isolates the second precursor ion and generates the second generation of product ions which are scanned out towards the detector. In comparison to MRM mode, MRM3 provides higher selectivity due to one additional fragmentation step. Both modes of operation are illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1
The novel AB SCIEX QTRAP® 5500 system uses the new and patented Linear Accelerator™ Trap designed to reduce the fragmentation time and to increase the MRM3 excitation efficiency delivering a whole new level of MRM3 performance. This, together with the high sensitivity of the mass spectrometer and faster scanning of up to 20000Da/s, allows performing MRM3 with lower detection limits and with shorter cycle times than previous generations of QTRAP® systems.
The detected masses in MRM and MRM3 mode with compound dependent parameters are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Selectivity
A homogenized apple was spiked with 10ppb Malathion, extracted using a QuEChERS procedure, diluted 50 times to minimize matrix effects, and analyzed by LC–MS-MS. The resulting chromatograms using two MRM transitions and two MRM3 experiments are shown in Figure 3. The MRM transition 331/127 showed expected selectivity, while the second transition 331/99 had an elevated background level and also matrix interference. In contrast both MRM3 experiments showed superior selectivity for reliable quantitation.
Figure 3
Applied Biosystems
850 Lincoln Centre Drive, Foster City, CA 94404
tel. (650)638-5800, toll free (800)345-5224
Website: www.appliedbiosystems.com
Analytical Challenges in Measuring Migration from Food Contact Materials
November 2nd 2015Food contact materials contain low molecular weight additives and processing aids which can migrate into foods leading to trace levels of contamination. Food safety is ensured through regulations, comprising compositional controls and migration limits, which present a significant analytical challenge to the food industry to ensure compliance and demonstrate due diligence. Of the various analytical approaches, LC-MS/MS has proved to be an essential tool in monitoring migration of target compounds into foods, and more sophisticated approaches such as LC-high resolution MS (Orbitrap) are being increasingly used for untargeted analysis to monitor non-intentionally added substances. This podcast will provide an overview to this area, illustrated with various applications showing current approaches being employed.
Using Chromatography to Study Microplastics in Food: An Interview with Jose Bernal
December 16th 2024LCGC International sat down with Jose Bernal to discuss his latest research in using pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py-GC–MS) and other chromatographic techniques in studying microplastics in food analysis.
The Use of SPME and GC×GC in Food Analysis: An Interview with Giorgia Purcaro
December 16th 2024LCGC International sat down with Giorgia Purcaro of the University of Liege to discuss the impact that solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and comprehensive multidimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) is having on food analysis.