Researchers have performed a volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis of coffee beans using a person-portable gas chromatography–toroidal ion-trap mass spectrometry (ppGC–TMS), and then compared it to a benchtop GC system (1).
Coffea canephora and Coffea arabica beans are amongst the most highly traded global agricultural commodities, with the beverages created from those beans incredibly popular. On top of the stimulating effects of caffeine, coffee offers a wide variety of aromas and taste profiles, with an entire sub-culture emerging to revere this plant product. A roasted coffee bean will have a complex composition from a combination of VOCs, including alcohols, esters, acids, pyrazines, phenols, and furans, amongst other compounds. All of these are a result of the many variables present in the life cycle of the food product, from plant to final brewed product. Coffee variety, growing conditions, fermentation, processing, roasting conditions, and brewing all contribute to the emergence of these unique VOC profiles. The assurance and consistency of that unique VOC profile is one of the key challenges for coffee producers. Currently, benchtop GC–MS is used for quality control and provides the gold standard for nontargeted, qualitative detection and identification of complex mixtures of VOCs. However, the separation and identification of compounds is only one half of the battle, with suitability, cost, time, and ease-of-use of the technique for implementation during the roasting process all requiring consideration.
As such, researchers investigated ppGC–TMS as an alternative solution. Theoretically, ppGC–TMS should be able to provide fast GC analysis, adequate sensitivity, and adequate selectivity, as well as the ability to be implemented at near to real-time over the duration of a coffee roasting process without the need for additional infrastructure. The researchers then compared the capabilities of ppGC–TMS to conventional GC–quadrupole time-of-flight MS (GC–QTOF-MS) and GC–quadrupole MS (GC–QMS) to contextualize the capabilities of the portable instrumentation and how associated design features alter the separation and detection of analytes.
The results of the study indicated that ppGC–TMS with headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) sampling provided a suitable compromise of reduced analytical capabilities for rapid and on-site analysis that could be used for VOC formation monitoring during the coffee roasting process.—L.B.
Reference
Maximizing Cannabinoid Separation for Potency Testing with LC
April 7th 2025Researchers from the Department of Chemistry at Western Illinois University (Macomb, Illinois) conducted a study to optimize the separation of 18 cannabinoids for potency testing of hemp-based products, using liquid chromatography with a diode array detector (LC–DAD). As part of our monthlong series of articles pertaining to National Cannabis Awareness Month, LCGC International spoke to Liguo Song, the corresponding author of the paper stemming from this research, to discuss the study and its findings.
How Many Repetitions Do I Need? Caught Between Sound Statistics and Chromatographic Practice
April 7th 2025In chromatographic analysis, the number of repeated measurements is often limited due to time, cost, and sample availability constraints. It is therefore not uncommon for chromatographers to do a single measurement.