The Application Notebook
Our work focuses on the synthesis of branched (functionalized) polydienes via a facile two-step synthesis. Despite the numerous strategies developed for the preparation of branched polymers in recent years, there is still a limited number of simple synthetic strategies based on common vinyl monomers.
Wyatt Technology Corporation
Our work focuses on the synthesis of branched (functionalized) polydienes via a facile two-step synthesis. Despite the numerous strategies developed for the preparation of branched polymers in recent years, there is still a limited number of simple synthetic strategies based on common vinyl monomers.
Table I: Molar mass comparisons
Linear polyisoprene and polybutadiene ABn-type macro-monomers were prepared by living anionic polymerization in THF (to ensure 1,2-addition) and terminated with chlordimethylsilane to get a terminal silane as the A-functionality of the macromonomer and the pendant vinyl groups of the polymer backbone as the B-functionalities. The macromonomers were reacted in a hydrosilylation polyaddition using Karstedt's catalyst to give branched polymers (Figure 1). We measured the macromonomers as well as the branched polymers using MALS. Even for the smallest macromonomer (Mn=1000) light scattering gives a reasonable result compared with NMR.
Figure 1
It is well-known that branched polymers elute later in a GPC-experiment than their linear analogues with same molecular weight, due to their compact architecture. So GPC alone can only give a rough estimation of the molar mass (because of polystyrene calibration). This becomes even more important when the double bonds are functionalized with small silanes, e.g. phenyldimethylsilane, which do not change the hydrodynamic radius of the polymer–and so show the same elution time as unfuntionalized polymers; the molecular weights are therefore drastically underestimated.
Figure 2
Figure 3
Using light scattering during the GPC experiment to determine the molar mass of the branched structures is an effective and rapid way to get quantitative information for the rate of functionalization and the molar mass (Figure 2). For the linear polymers, the molar mass can be determined, and for the branched structures, light scattering is the only way to get to real mass.
Wyatt Technology Corporation
6300 Hollister Avenue
Santa Barbara, CA 93117
TEL (805) 681-9009; FAX (805) 681-0123
E-mail: info@wyatt.com
Direct Analysis of Class 2 Residual Solvents Using Molecular Rotational Resonance Spectroscopy
February 19th 2025Molecular rotational resonance (MRR) spectroscopy operates in the microwave region, detecting transitions between pure rotational energy levels. Combined with adiabatic cooling, MRR produces highly selective spectra unique to each molecule’s atomic structure. Even slight changes in atomic position or mass result in distinct spectral differences, allowing MRR to directly analyze complex mixtures, including isomers, without chromatographic separation. This article presents a continuous headspace-MRR method for analyzing Class 2 residual solvents, including low-volatility solvents from Class 2 Mixture C. By evaluating solvents with diverse boiling points, the study demonstrates that MRR meets ICH and USP standards for most Class 2 and Class 3 solvents and half of Class 1 solvents.
Revolutionizing LC-MS with Next-Gen Separation for Cyclic Peptide Analysis
February 17th 2025Cyclic peptides, known for their stability and high specificity, are promising therapeutic agents in the fight against cancer, infections, and autoimmune diseases. However, developing effective cyclic peptides presents numerous challenges, including poor pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity. Traditional methods like liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) often struggle with resolving isomeric linear peptide metabolites, posing significant risks in safety, efficacy, and regulatory approval. In this paper, Komal Kedia, PhD, will share how she leveraged MOBIE’s high-resolution ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) system to achieve a 72% reduction in run times, 200% greater resolving power, and enhanced accuracy in identifying “soft spots” prone to enzymatic degradation.