High-Throughput Quantitative Analysis of Vitamin D Using a Multiple Parallel LC–MS System Combined with Integrated On-Line SPE
Special Issues
A newly developed high-throughput method for the quantitation of vitamin D using both multiplexed LC and on-line SPE is discussed.
Recently, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS-MS) has emerged as a reliable method to perform 25-OH-vitamin D3 and 25-OH-vitamin D2 analysis. Because sample preparation and LC separation are usually the most time consuming steps in a typical quantitative LC–MS-MS analysis, we have developed a high-throughput method for the quantitation of vitamin D using both multiplexed LC and on-line SPE. The overlapping LC runs and targeted data acquisition, combined with online sample preparation, result in a higher overall throughput for the system. The method described here is for the routine analysis of 25-OH-vitamin D3 and D2 (25-hydroxycholecalciferol and 25-hydroxyergocalciferol) in human serum and plasma samples. Calibration is performed using a lyophilized, multilevel plasma calibrator set of known concentration. Lyophilized plasma control samples at clinically relevant low and high concentrations serve to establish the target analyte range. The method uses deuterated 25-OH-vitamin D3 as an internal standard to correct for sample and instrument variability. Samples are analyzed using the atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI) mode for maximum sensitivity.
Vitamin D comprises a group of fat-soluble vitamins involved in the regulation of calcium and phosphorus levels in the body (1). Research has shown that vitamin D deficiencies are linked to colon and breast cancers (2), impaired bone mineralization, rickets in children, and possibly osteoporosis in adults (3). The two major forms are vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol). Vitamin D3 is produced in the skin upon exposure to ultraviolet B radiation from sunlight, or may be obtained from nutritional sources, especially fatty fish. Vitamin D2 is not synthesized by the human body and must be obtained from plant and other nutritional sources. Vitamin D3 is converted to 25-OH-vitamin D3 in the liver and then further hydroxylated to 1,25-OH-vitamin D3, the major biologically active hormone, in the kidneys. Vitamin D is stored in the body as 25-OH-vitamin D, which is the most commonly measured metabolite for determining an individual's vitamin D levels.
Traditional laboratory-based testing for 25-OH-vitamin D3 and 25-OH-vitamin D2 is performed using radioimmunoassay (RIA), chemiluminescence immunoassay, or high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)–UV. Recently, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS-MS) has emerged as a reliable method to perform 25-OH-vitamin D3 and 25-OH-vitamin D2 analysis (4). To improve the throughput of LC–MS-MS analysis, we have developed a rapid method for the quantification of these analytes using a system that has been specifically designed to significantly increase the throughput of routine assays by accelerating both the sample preparation and the LC analysis. The system synchronizes autosampler injection ports, LC pumps, selector valve, and a mass spectrometer, enabling the autosampler to inject samples into two parallel LC streams using a system-defined timing schedule. The mass spectrometer acquires data throughout a specified retention time window in each LC sample run. The system also controls a series of switching valves, which are used for on-line solid-phase extraction (SPE) and the subsequent liquid chromatography analysis. The overlapping LC runs and targeted data acquisition, combined with online sample preparation, result in a higher overall throughput for the system. This application demonstrates how the multiplex system with integrated on-line sample cleanup can be used to double the throughput of the vitamin D analysis by LC–MS-MS.
Experimental
An MPX-2 SP High-Throughput System (AB Sciex, Foster City, California) with on-line SPE was used for the analysis of 25-OH-vitamin D3 and D2. The integrated multiplex LC–MS-MS system consisted of a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (AB Sciex), two Prominence XR LC systems (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), a CTC PAL autosampler (CTC Analytics, Zwingen, Switzerland) with DLW option, a pump containing a four-solvent selection valve for sample loading and cleanup, and five switching valves for flow path control (Figure 1). The two chromatographic channels in the multiplex system share a single high-pressure loading pump, which provides additional flexibility for injection and wash solvent composition. All hardware modules are controlled by Analyst 1.5.1 software (AB Sciex) with the MPX Driver Software 1.1 (AB Sciex). Throughout the analysis, precise timing for the switching valves allowed each LC stream to perform interleaved injection, on-line sample cleanup, and LC gradient elution. Targeted MS data acquisition was enabled by the selection of a retention time window around the chromatographic peaks of interest using the MPX Method Editor. Figure 2 shows common flow paths for a typical on-line sample cleanup and LC–MS-MS analysis.
Figure 1: Integrated multiplex LCâMS-MS system configuration and module arrangement used in the analysis of 25-OH-vitamin D3 and 25-OH-vitamin D2.
Sample Preparation
Lyophilized calibrators and controls were obtained from Chromsystems (Munich, Germany), and were reconstituted in distilled water. A 100-μL volume of each sample-calibrator-control was pipetted into a 1.5-mL reaction vial. Next, 25 μL of a precipation reagent and 200 μL of an internal standard solution were added, and the samples were mixed using a vortex mixer for at least 20 s to precipitate the proteins. Samples were then incubated for 10 min at 4 °C in a water–ice bath, and centrifuged at 15,000g for 10 min. The clean, precipitate-free supernatant was transferred to an HPLC vial equipped with a 200-μL insert for analysis by LC–MS-MS.
Figure 2: Plumbing diagrams and solvent flow paths at typical states of a multiplex run. Upper left: loading stream 1, eluting stream 2, acquiring stream 2; upper right: loading stream 2, eluting stream 1, acquiring stream 1; lower left: eluting stream 1, eluting stream 2, acquiring stream 1; lower right: eluting stream 1, eluting stream 2, acquiring stream 2.
HPLC
Chromatographic separation was achieved using the analytical column included in the Chromsystems MassChrom reagent kit for the LC–MS-MS analysis of 25-OH-vitamin D3/D2 in serum or plasma. Mobile phases A and B were used as provided in the kit. The injected sample was initially loaded onto a trap column and rinsed for 1 min using mobile phase A. After 1 min, the sample was eluted from the trap column onto the analytical column, using mobile phase B. The duration of the entire run was 5 min.
Figure 3: Method pane of the MPX Driver software.
MS-MS
MS detection was carried out using the integrated multiplex LC–MS-MS system operating in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization (APCI) was used, in positive polarity mode, for maximum sensitivity. The MRM transitions 383.4/211.3 and 395.3/269.3 were used to detect 25-OH-vitamin D3 and 25-OH-vitamin D2, respectively. Both Q1 and Q3 were operated at unit resolution.
Figure 4: Sequence of timed events during a typical multiplex run.
Results and Discussion
A multiplex LC method was created using the hardware module control software, which synchronizes sample injections in staggered LC runs and enables targeted MS data acquisition in a predetermined retention time window on both of the parallel LC streams. The retention time window to be used for MS data acquisition was specified by highlighting the chromatographic region of interest (Figure 3).
Figure 5: Representative chromatograms on stream 1 and 2. Left: Chromsystems calibrator level 1 at 19.2 ng/mL (47.8 nmol/L) 25-OH-vitamin D3 and 15.5 ng/mL (37.5 nmol/L) 25-OH-vitamin D2. Right: Chromsystems control level 1 at 16.7 ng/mL (41.7 nmol/L) 25-OH-vitamin D3 and 17.4 ng/mL (42.1 nmol/L) 25-OH-vitamin D2.
A conventional singleplex LC–MS-MS analysis of 25-OH-vitamin D3 and 25-OH-vitamin D2 was performed, consisting of 92 consecutive injections, and the run time was then compared to that of the equivalent multiplex LC–MS-MS analysis of 92 samples using the integrated multiplex LC–MS-MS system. The sequence of timed events during the multiplex run is illustrated in Figure 4. The use of Cliquid software (AB Sciex) enabled automated sample analysis, processing of acquired data, and reporting of results. The total run time for the singleplex analysis was 8 h 26 min. In comparison, the run time for the multiplex analysis was 4 h 19 min, thus saving 4 h 17 min and increasing overall throughput 1.9 times.
Table I: Accuracy and precision for analysis of 25-OH-vitamin D3
The quality of the results was in no way compromised when the analysis was performed on parallel channels using the integrated multiplex LC–MS-MS system. Representative chromatograms for Calibrator 1 and Control 1 are shown in Figure 5, and the %CVs and accuracies obtained for the calibrators and controls (analyzed on both streams) are summarized in Tables I and II. The coefficient of variation obtained for the analysis of the calibrators and controls, using on-line sample clean-up, were all less than 10%, and the accuracies ranged from 85.9% to 107.6% for both 25-OH vitamin D3 and 25-OH vitamin D2, on both stream 1 and stream 2.
Table II: Accuracy and precision for analysis of 25-OH-vitamin D2
The calibration curves in Figure 6 were generated using the Chromsystems plasma calibrators, with the low- and high-level controls. The calibration curves were produced on both LC streams, for both 25-OH vitamin D3 and 25-OH vitamin D2, and demonstrate the range and linearity obtained for the assay. These results demonstrate that the data integrity was maintained when adapting the singleplex on-line SPE LC–MS-MS method to the integrated multiplex LC–MS-MS system.
Figure 6: Standard calibration curves for 25-OH-vitamin D2 and 25-OH-vitamin D3.
Conclusions
The ability to multiplex two LC systems, synchronized to a single tandem mass spectrometer, allows laboratories to increase throughput to handle increasing numbers of samples. The dual channel multiplex LC–MS-MS system, with integrated and automated on-line sample cleanup, achieved a twofold increase in throughput for the analysis of 25-OH-vitamin D2 and 25-OH-vitamin D3 when compared to the same analysis performed on a conventional LC–MS-MS system with on-line SPE. This allows for considerable savings in both time and cost. No compromise in data quality, accuracy, or reproducibility was observed when the identical analysis was transferred from a singleplex to a multiplex system.
References
(1) Dietary Supplement Fact Sheet: Vitamin D. National Institutes of Health. Office of Dietary Supplements. http://dietary-supplements.info.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamind.asp
(2) M.F. Holick, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 80(6), 1678–1688 (2004).
(3) K. Rajakumar, Pediatrics 112(2), 132–135 (2003).
(4) Z. Maunsell, D.J. Wright, and S.J. Rainbow, Clin. Chem. 51(9), 1683–1690 (2005).
Adrian M. Taylor and Michael J. Y. Jarvis are with AB Sciex, 71 Four Valley Drive, Concord, Canada L4K 4V8.
AI and GenAI Applications to Help Optimize Purification and Yield of Antibodies From Plasma
October 31st 2024Deriving antibodies from plasma products involves several steps, typically starting from the collection of plasma and ending with the purification of the desired antibodies. These are: plasma collection; plasma pooling; fractionation; antibody purification; concentration and formulation; quality control; and packaging and storage. This process results in a purified antibody product that can be used for therapeutic purposes, diagnostic tests, or research. Each step is critical to ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of the final product. Applications of AI/GenAI in many of these steps can significantly help in the optimization of purification and yield of the desired antibodies. Some specific use-cases are: selecting and optimizing plasma units for optimized plasma pooling; GenAI solution for enterprise search on internal knowledge portal; analysing and optimizing production batch profitability, inventory, yields; monitoring production batch key performance indicators for outlier identification; monitoring production equipment to predict maintenance events; and reducing quality control laboratory testing turnaround time.
