GC–TOF-MS Finds 250 Volatile Compounds in E-Cigarette Liquids
A study in the Journal of Chromatography A used gas chromatography coupled to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer (GC–TOF-MS) to build an electron ionization mass spectra (EI-MS) database of more than 250 chemicals classified as either volatile or semi-volatile compounds (1). An additional, confirmatory layer of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis was subsequently performed.
This report out of the Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain, aimed to improve upon gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) detection considered the popular standard for analysis of “e-liquids” (1). The authors said both LC–MS and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy have been proposed for determination, but that only approximately 140 volatile compounds were previously identified.
Certain compounds produced by tobacco combustion in conventional cigarettes are not present in e-cigarettes, burnishing their reputation as a “safe” alternative (1). But the researchers list factors and symptoms indicating lung issues in consumers, from flavors that may cause oxidative stress to reactions between carbonyls and alcohols producing acetals, known respiratory irritants. Other addictive substances can be found in electronic smoking devices, such as nicotine and cannabinoids.
The research team sought a nontargeted approach, analyzing the e-liquids using two capillary columns with different polarities (1). The complementary LC–MS analysis was reserved for compounds identified at the highest of three levels of confidence, having satisfied three identification criteria. Study results showed while concentration ratios between delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in e-liquids fell into a relatively narrow range (between 0.02% and 0.3%), the ratio of propylene glycol acetals to parent aldehydes ranged from 2%, for ethyl vanillin, to upwards of 80% for benzaldehyde.
Reference
(1) Cobo Golpe, M.; Ramil, M.; Rodríguez, I. Comprehensive Characterization of Volatile and Semi-Volatile Compounds in E-Liquids for Electronic Cigarette Using Gas Chromatography Accurate Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2023, 1703, 464114. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464114
GC–MS Targeted Analysis of PFAS Helps Expand Knowledge of Toxicokinetic Data
November 1st 2024Limited toxicokinetic and toxicologic information is available about a diverse set of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), but methods based on gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) can help unravel some of the mystery.
Multivariate Design of Experiments for Gas Chromatographic Analysis
November 1st 2024Recent advances in green chemistry have made multivariate experimental design popular in sample preparation development. This approach helps reduce the number of measurements and data for evaluation and can be useful for method development in gas chromatography.
Detangling the Complex Web of GC × GC Method Development to Support New Users
November 1st 2024In this article, the authors describe a simple workflow to develop a GC×GC method for a specific sample upon initial use, with the aim of decreasing the time to accomplish functional workflows for new users.
Green Chemistry: What is it (and What Is It Not)? And How Does It Apply to Gas Chromatography?
October 31st 2024Everyone is talking about sustainability, and organizations are creating sustainability programs. But what does green chemistry really mean, and how does it apply to gas chromatography?
Identifying and Rectifying the Misuse of Retention Indices in Gas Chromatography
October 31st 2024LCGC International spoke to Phil Marriott and Humberto Bizzo about a recent paper they published identifying the incorrect use of retention indices in gas chromatography and how this problem can be rectified in practice.
