A study published in the journal Toxics proposed targeted methods, developed using gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS), to measure human plasma protein binding and hepatocyte clearance in 73 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) (1). The in vitro toxicokinetic (TK) information sought by the seven authors, most of whom are affiliated with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), may close gaps in TK or toxicologic knowledge that could signal the environmental fates of some of these PFAS regarding their metabolism, volatility, or other modes of transport.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), PFAS are used to make fluoropolymer coatings that can be found in products ranging from clothing to adhesives to food packaging to electrical wire insulation (2). These chemicals bioaccumulate in fish, wildlife, and water and therefore, in the humans who consume these contaminated sources. The Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) classifies PFAS as having at least one fully fluorinated methyl or methylene carbon atom; the OECD has established a list of 4730 known such substances, though specific information is available for all but a relative few (1,2).
Methods in this study were borne out of the EPA’s PFAS Strategic Roadmap, an outline for how to use in vitro toxicity testing and TK studies to broaden knowledge of PFAS bioactivity (1). Of 73 PFAS this team identified as amenable to GC–MS/MS in multiple functional groups, targeted analysis methods were developed for 61 (also using traditional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, GC–MS) with either positive or negative chemical ionization (PCI or NCI respectively). The authors said biotic stability, also measured in vitro, gave clues about the potential of PFAS for hydrolysis in aqueous environments.
Addressing the testing of human plasma protein binding, the study confirmed that PFAS are generally high binders (1). However, no trends were observed specific to any one of 21 functional categories which were evaluated. The authors found it likely that some PFAS would metabolize to other, more stable PFAS, with PFAS sulfonamides just one such instance of “precursor products” (1).
(1) Kreutz, A.; Clifton, M. S.; Henderson, W. M.; Smeltz, M. G.; Phillips, M.; Wambaugh, J. F.; Wetmore, B. A. Category-Based Toxicokinetic Evaluations of Data-Poor Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Using Gas Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry. Toxics 2023, 11 (5), 463. DOI: 10.3390/toxics11050463
(2) Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) Factsheet. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – National Biomonitoring Program. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/PFAS_FactSheet.html#:~:text=Print-,Per%2D%20 and%20Polyfluorinated%20Substances%20(PFAS),stains%2C%20grease%2C%20and%20 water. (accessed 2024-03-25).
Analysis of Pesticides in Foods Using GC–MS/MS: An Interview with José Fernando Huertas-Pérez
December 16th 2024In this LCGC International interview with José Fernando Huertas-Pérez who is a specialist in chemical contaminants analytics and mitigation at the Nestlé Institute for Food Safety and Analytical Sciences at Nestlé Research in Switzerland, In this interview we discuss his recent research work published in Food Chemistry on the subject of a method for quantifying multi-residue pesticides in food matrices using gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC–MS/MS) (1).
Using Chromatography to Study Microplastics in Food: An Interview with Jose Bernal
December 16th 2024LCGC International sat down with Jose Bernal to discuss his latest research in using pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py-GC–MS) and other chromatographic techniques in studying microplastics in food analysis.