Environmental laboratories analyze customer samples to determine the concentration of contaminants in soil, drinking water, and so on. Frequently these samples are diluted prior to analysis by the ICP-MS. It is critical that these dilutions are accurate and reproducible. In this study we compared the speed, accuracy, and consumable costs for common sample preparation techniques and found that the Microlab 600 is the best option.
Environmental laboratories analyze customer samples to determine the concentration of contaminants in soil, drinking water, and so on. Frequently these samples are diluted prior to analysis by the ICP-MS. It is critical that these dilutions are accurate and reproducible. In this study we compared the speed, accuracy, and consumable costs for common sample preparation techniques and found that the Microlab 600 is the best option.
Pipettes, volumetric glassware, syringes, and the Microlab 600 Diluter are commonly used to dilute environmental samples. Each of these techniques offers different advantages and disadvantages. Volumetric glassware is easy to use but dilution waste volumes are large and the glassware requires cleaning. Pipettes have small dilution volumes but the accuracy varies across different solvents. Additionally, the consumable plastic tip increases cost per sample and for some applications can leach contaminants. Syringes produce small dilution volumes and are inert, but manual operation and cleaning reduces throughput. The Microlab 600 has small dilution volumes, an inert fluid path, and is the fastest of the techniques.
Each technique (volumetric glassware, pipettes, syringes, and the Microlab 600) was used to prepare dilutions of a standard stock solution. The samples were diluted to 1:1, 1:4, 1:9, 1:49, 1:99, and 1:199 in replicates of five. Each technique was performed one at a time. The samples were then analyzed and the data plotted to compare the accuracy of the different techniques.
The results shown in Figure 1 show the dilution series for each technique along with a best fit line and an R2 value. All techniques showed a high correlation but the Microlab 600 was the highest with a value of 0.9992.
Each of the techniques yielded accurate dilutions with an aqueous stock solution. Of the four options tested the Microlab 600 consumed the least amount of sample and diluent, required no consumable pipette tips, and had an inert fluid path making it compatible with all tests performed in an environmental lab.
Additional head to head testing was performed between pipettes and the Microlab 600 using live samples at a local environmental lab. This testing showed that the Microlab 600 achieved a 40% reduction in processing time making it the clear choice for environmental sample preparation.
4970 Energy Way, Reno, NV 89502
tel. (775) 858-3000, fax (775) 856-7259
Website: www.hamiltoncompany.com
Direct Analysis of Class 2 Residual Solvents Using Molecular Rotational Resonance Spectroscopy
February 19th 2025Molecular rotational resonance (MRR) spectroscopy operates in the microwave region, detecting transitions between pure rotational energy levels. Combined with adiabatic cooling, MRR produces highly selective spectra unique to each molecule’s atomic structure. Even slight changes in atomic position or mass result in distinct spectral differences, allowing MRR to directly analyze complex mixtures, including isomers, without chromatographic separation. This article presents a continuous headspace-MRR method for analyzing Class 2 residual solvents, including low-volatility solvents from Class 2 Mixture C. By evaluating solvents with diverse boiling points, the study demonstrates that MRR meets ICH and USP standards for most Class 2 and Class 3 solvents and half of Class 1 solvents.
Revolutionizing LC-MS with Next-Gen Separation for Cyclic Peptide Analysis
February 17th 2025Cyclic peptides, known for their stability and high specificity, are promising therapeutic agents in the fight against cancer, infections, and autoimmune diseases. However, developing effective cyclic peptides presents numerous challenges, including poor pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity. Traditional methods like liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) often struggle with resolving isomeric linear peptide metabolites, posing significant risks in safety, efficacy, and regulatory approval. In this paper, Komal Kedia, PhD, will share how she leveraged MOBIE’s high-resolution ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS) system to achieve a 72% reduction in run times, 200% greater resolving power, and enhanced accuracy in identifying “soft spots” prone to enzymatic degradation.