Josh Hoerner is the general manager of Purisys.
Nitrosamines emerged as a growing concern in pharmaceuticals in 2018, prompting regulatory agencies to collaborate with drug manufacturers to reduce the presence of these potentially cancer-causing compounds in medications. (1). In January 2025, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) posted “Determining Recommended Acceptable Intake Limits for N-nitrosamine Impurities in Pharmaceuticals: Development and Application of the Carcinogenic Potency Categorization Approach” in the Spotlight on CDER Science on the FDA website (2).
We spoke with Josh Hoerner, general manager of Purisys, which specializes in a small volume custom synthesis and specialized controlled substance manufacturing, to gain his perspective on FDA’s recommendations for acceptable intake limits for N-nitrosamine impurities.
What are nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs)?
NDSRIs are nitrosamine impurities that share structural similarities with the API and are generally unique to each API. These impurities are considered more complex and require more sophisticated testing methods to detect and quantify. The presence of NDSRIs is considered a higher risk, especially when the impurity forms as a result of the API’s chemical structure or the processes used during production.
The advanced testing conducted to determine the presence of NDSRIs involves sophisticated and sensitive mass spectrometry (MS) technology, including triple quadrupole technology, which enables liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A high-sensitivity, low-level quantitation technology is particularly advantageous for detecting nitrosamines and other impurities that must remain within low permissible levels (based on safety data, a comparator, or the Carcinogenic Potency Categorization Approach [CPCA] Potency score).
What can you tell us about the recommendations FDA published in January 2025 for the development and application of carcinogenic potency categorization approach to nitrosamines?
Safety data (animal carcinogenicity data) for many potential NSDRIs or comparators are not readily available. FDA worked with the Nitrosamine International Technical Working Group (NITWG) to develop a methodology called the CPCA. The approach is based on a training set of 81 nitrosamines to establish five potency categories (1 high–5 low), reflecting carcinogenic risk. Essentially, the CPCA applies the knowledge that the a-hydroxylation mechanism of metabolic activation and the associated number of a-hydrogens as well as associated activating and deactivating features, drives nitrosamine potency. This allows a potency score for a potential NDSRI to be calculated along with the associated acceptable intake without direct safety data. Using this framework, a drug product manufacturer can then assess their drug products for NDSRIs below the acceptable intake and ensure patients are not exposed to levels exceeding or approaching the acceptable intake.
What makes determining acceptable intake so challenging?
There is a lack of direct safety data on NDSRIs and comparator compounds to establish a basis for potency. Prior to the CPCA framework, one might default to higher acceptable intake limits such as the 1500 ng/day, whereas those with higher potency scores have higher carcinogenicity risk, and therefore, should be controlled to lower acceptable intake levels.
What can pharma manufacturers do to manage the nitrosamine risk?
There are two key guidelines included in the FDA-published compliance recommendations that define the framework for nitrosamine assessment and control:
Risk assessment and control of nitrosamine formation. Manufacturers should evaluate and control two types of nitrosamine impurities:
Small-molecule nitrosamines (structurally different from the API)
NDSRIs, structurally similar to the API.
Acceptable daily intake limits. Risk assessments should determine if nitrosamines are likely present, followed by testing. If testing shows nitrosamine impurity is present at a level 10% above the acceptable intake limit for that specific nitrosamine, FDA recommends that manufacturers develop specifications to keep nitrosamine levels within limits.
A comprehensive approach includes an initial paper-based assessment of technical risks (e.g., chemistry, solvents, excipients), followed by testing according to USP [United States Pharmacopeia] General Chapter 1469.11. Risk ratings (low, medium, high) are assigned based on the likelihood of nitrosamine formation, with secondary amines posing the highest risk.
Manufacturers should partner with experienced contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs) that offer a comprehensive solution for testing, synthesis, and risk assessment to ensure compliance with these complex requirements.
What Goes in a CDS IT Service Level Agreement?
Published: April 7th 2025 | Updated: April 7th 2025Protecting your network chromatography data system (CDS) data is critical and a service level agreement (SLA) with your IT provider is vital. What should be included? Are SLAs for in-house IT and SaaS (software as a service) similar?
Advanced LC–MS Analysis for PFAS Analysis in Eggs
October 11th 2024The European Commission's regulation on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food highlights the need for precise and reliable methods to quantify per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in various food matrices. This article discusses development and validation of a robust method for analyzing 21 PFAS compounds in chicken eggs using solid-phase extraction (SPE) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS).