The mechanisms of mixed-mode chromatography are discussed with reference to the parameters that are used to optimize selectivity and retention. Illustrative examples are presented with strategies for column selection and screening to allow this technique to be quickly and effectively adopted by end users.
An excerpt from LCGC's e-learning tutorial on mixed-mode separations at CHROMacademy.com
Although reversed-phase columns (such as C18) are used in a wide range of applications, they often fail to retain highly polar (or charged) analytes, and offer limited selectivity.
Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) is often used to analyze polar analytes, but encounters challenges such as increased use of organic solvents, poor solubility of analytes in highly organic media, retention effects created by the sample matrix, and a limitation to the extent to which the retention of hydrophobic analytes can be controlled. Ion-exchange chromatography can be used to retain charged molecules, but it fails to retain neutral analytes and can show poor selectivity for analytes of the same charge. A current estimate of the usage of these two techniques is reversed phase ~60+%; HILIC or normal phase ~18%; ion exchange ~5%.
The use of mixed-mode stationary phases can offer a solution to some of the problems outlined above and their properties and applications can be summarized as follows:
A general schematic for the various approaches to producing mixed-mode stationary phases is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the various approaches to producing mixed-mode stationary phases.
The mixed beads approach in Figure 1 is a blend of two different stationary phases into a single column: Reversed phase (in black) and ion exchange (in red). This approach creates concerns regarding the batch-to-batch reproducibility and homogeneity of the resulting high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) columns.
The mixed ligand approach to mixed-mode stationary phase production was a second-generation product, but again, ensuring the absolutely reproducibility and homogeneity of the surface is problematic.
Embedded and tipped ligands are a third-generation approach to mixed-mode phases and produce homogeneous and reproducible mixed-mode phases. The position of the ion-exchange group within the bonded phase ligand dictates the relative strength of the hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions and the embedded ligand can be described as an ion-exchange–modified reversed-phase column and the tipped ligand as a reversed-phase–modified ion-exchange column.
The zwitterionic ligand is a fourth-generation approach to mixed-mode separations in which both anionic and cationic functional groups are included in each ligand and the strength and position of the ion-exchange moieties can be altered to affect the selectivity of each ligand towards various analytes.
In mixed-mode separations, the hydrophobic moieties of analyte molecules are retained by interaction with the hydrophobic parts of the bonded ligand, and the charged groups are either retained or repelled by the ion-exchange groups on the stationary phase surface. There are several ways to control retention and selectivity with mixed-mode phases, as one might imagine.
The amount of organic modifier can be altered to affect changes in retention and selectivity of the separation, primarily by changing the hydrophobicity of the eluent, as would be typical for a reversed-phase separation.
Eluent pH can also be used to alter selectivity and retention, and the pH will affect not only the degree of ionization of the analyte molecule, but also the extent of the surface charge if weak anion- or cation-exchange ligands are used. The ionic strength of the eluent can be used to alter the separation characteristics, and ionic-strength gradients are often used to increase the elution strength of the eluent with respect to the electrostatic interactions between analytes and the stationary phase surface.
The nature of mixed mode stationary phases offer several possibilities to "tune" the selectivity of a separation and as such offer an important tool in the analytical armoury for anyone dealing with highly polar analytes or analytes whose physicochemical properties differ widely.
AI and GenAI Applications to Help Optimize Purification and Yield of Antibodies From Plasma
October 31st 2024Deriving antibodies from plasma products involves several steps, typically starting from the collection of plasma and ending with the purification of the desired antibodies. These are: plasma collection; plasma pooling; fractionation; antibody purification; concentration and formulation; quality control; and packaging and storage. This process results in a purified antibody product that can be used for therapeutic purposes, diagnostic tests, or research. Each step is critical to ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of the final product. Applications of AI/GenAI in many of these steps can significantly help in the optimization of purification and yield of the desired antibodies. Some specific use-cases are: selecting and optimizing plasma units for optimized plasma pooling; GenAI solution for enterprise search on internal knowledge portal; analysing and optimizing production batch profitability, inventory, yields; monitoring production batch key performance indicators for outlier identification; monitoring production equipment to predict maintenance events; and reducing quality control laboratory testing turnaround time.
2024 EAS Awardees Showcase Innovative Research in Analytical Science
November 20th 2024Scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Washington, and other leading institutions took the stage at the Eastern Analytical Symposium to accept awards and share insights into their research.