Scientists from Universidade Federal do Paraná in Curitiba, Brazil tested a new extraction device for determining carcinogenic aromatic amines in smoker urine. Their findings were published in the Journal of Chromatography A (1).
Tobacco consumption is known to have carcinogenic side effects, which is part of why it remains a worldwide health issue. In 2016, approximately 5.7 trillion cigarettes were consumed worldwide, with China corresponding to 49.1% of all cigarette consumption. Carcinogens are substances that can increase the risk of developing cancer (2). More than100 carcinogens have been identified. These carcinogens can trigger a chain reaction that turns normal cells into cancerous cells.
Tobacco smoke can generate approximately 60 carcinogenic compounds, including aromatic amines (AA). AA is of particular interest for recent biomonitoring, with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Agency for Research on Cancer recognizing 1-naphthylamine (1-NA) and 2-naphthylamine (2-NA), two AA generated in tobacco burning, as having carcinogenic potential.
Analysis on these substances has become of interest lately, with miniaturized solid phase extraction techniques, such as microporous membrane solid phase extraction (MMSPE), showing potential for extracting aromatic compounds. For this study, the scientists developed a bioanalytical method for the determination of 1-NA and 2-NA in human urine; as part of this, polypropylene microporous membranes were used as a sorptive phase for MMSPE.
Urine samples were hydrolyzed using hydrochloric acid (HCl) for 1 h at 80 °C, with pH being adjusted to 10. Afterwards, ultrasound-assisted MMSPE procedures were optimized by factorial designs. To each sample, 750 µL of methanol was added, and ultrasound-assisted MMSPE was conducted for 1 h with four devices containing seven 2 mm polypropylene membrane segments. After extraction, the segments were transferred to 400 µL of hexane, and desorption was conducted for 30 min. Extracts were submitted to a simple and fast microwave-assisted derivatization procedure, by the addition of 10 µL of PFPA and heating at 480 W for 3 min, followed by clean-up with phosphate buffer pH 8.0 and GC–MS/MS analysis. Adequate linearity was obtained for both analytes in a range from 25 to 500 µg L−1, while the multiple reaction monitoring approach provided satisfactory selectivity and specificity.
According to the scientists, this method provides the advantage of reduction of time required for derivatization; this stems from the use of a microwave-assisted approach instead of heating in a thermostatic bath, while ultrasound-assisted MMSPE took an amount of time compared to other MMSPE-based methods previously reported in the literature for determination of aromatic compounds. The stability of urine samples and derivatized extracts were successfully ascertained in working and storage conditions broached by the developed method. Further, in applying the method to urine samples provided by first- and second-hand smokers, 1-NA was found to be present in first-hand smokers’ urine, while none of the analytes were found in second-hand smoker samples.
Alongside these findings, MMSPE was shown to be applicable with polypropylene microporous membranes as an extraction technique for biological fluids, since this is the first method using urine as a matrix, and such matrices are highly complex. The range of compounds for which MMSPE devices can prove efficient was also broadened with this study, as according to the scientists, “this is the first method for the determination of AAs with polypropylene microporous membranes” (1). Though there is more research to be done, MMSPE devices can be considered a viable and low-cost alternative to devices used in previously reported bioanalytical methods for the determination of AAs in urine aiming at its biomonitoring.
(1) Cestaro, B. I.; Nagata, N.; da Silva, B. J. G. Evaluation of polypropylene microporous membranes as extraction devices for determination of carcinogenic aromatic amines in smoker urine by GC–MS/MS. J. Chromatogr. A 2024, 1729, 465030. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465030
(2) Carcinogens. Cleveland Clinic 2024. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/25081-carcinogens (accessed 2024-6-25)
Inside the Laboratory: The Richardson Group at the University of South Carolina
November 20th 2024In this edition of “Inside the Laboratory,” Susan Richardson of the University of South Carolina discusses her laboratory’s work with using electron ionization and chemical ionization with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) to detect DBPs in complex environmental matrices, and how her work advances environmental analysis.
RAFA 2024 Highlights: Cutting-Edge Chromatography Techniques for Food Safety and Food Analysis
November 18th 2024An illuminating session focusing on progress in analytical techniques used in food analysis took place on Wednesday 6 November 2024 at RAFA 2024 in Prague, The Czech Republic, including a talk on the analysis of 1000 toxins in 10 minutes.
RAFA 2024 Highlights: Contemporary Food Contamination Analysis Using Chromatography
November 18th 2024A series of lectures focusing on emerging analytical techniques used to analyse food contamination took place on Wednesday 6 November 2024 at RAFA 2024 in Prague, Czech Republic. The session included new approaches for analysing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polychlorinated alkanes (PCAS), Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons (MOH), and short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs and MCCPs).