A guide to selecting the correct HPLC stationary phase.
An excerpt from LCGC's e-learning tutorial on HPLC stationary phases at CHROMacademy.com
There is a bewildering array of stationary-phase choices available for reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and even within each phase designation (such as "C18") the selectivity of each phase can vary widely.
Let's be honest, a lot of our method development is carried out using trial and error, typically based on phases that have worked for us in the past or are the "new best thing" from our favourite manufacturer. Even those of us with advanced "screening" platforms containing arrays of carefully considered orthogonal chemistries and computer-optimized eluent design systems, sometimes have to resort to "chromatographer's instinct".
Figure 1: Retention mechanisms of some common reversed-phase ligands and residual silica surface species.
Retention in reversed-phase HPLC is typically based on an equilibrium between the analyte, the mobile phase, and the bonded stationary phase (C18, for example), and the nature and accessibility of the silica surface onto which the ligand is bonded. The chemistry of the bonded phase, the nature of the silica surface treatment, and the surface accessibility all need to be considered and classified to properly understand the retention mechanisms that are influencing a separation, which will then influence the initial column choice or method optimization.
Figure 2: Radar plots of similar (right) and orthogonal (left) stationary phases based on data from the PQRI database, which in turn is based on the hydrophobic subtraction model.
Dispersive interactions are predominant in most reversed-phase separations, especially those using unmodified alkyl ligands (C18, C8, C4), and retention will be proportional to the hydrophobicity of the analyte. Charge transfer (or π–π) interactions are in play when aromatic or unsaturated phases or analytes are analyzed. Dipole-hydrogen bonding interactions are important for the retention of polar compounds, and stationary phases such as "cyano" enhance this type of retention. Electrostatic interactions occur between ionized sites on the analyte molecule and the silica surface, and in most cases are caused by ionized residual silanol groups.
Many column-classification systems exist, based on the use of various chemical test probes that are known to describe unique characteristics of a stationary phase, and one very useful example is the Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) database hosted within the USP website (http://www.usp.org/app/USPNF/columnsDB.html). This database uses the hydrophobic subtraction model of retention (1,2) to describe phases based on hydrophobicity (H), the ability to distinguish between analytes of similar hydrophobicity but different shape or hydrodynamic volume, shape selectivity (S), hydrogen bonding (the ability to act as a Lewis acid [A] or a Lewis base [B]), and electrostatic interaction (C) at pH 7.0 (total silanol activity) and pH 2.8 (acidic silanol activity likely to cause tailing with polar or ionizable analytes). More unique or orthogonal phases tend to have larger values for S, B, and C (7.0). These large databases are useful to compare phase characteristics and "radar plots" are a very useful way to do this.
Table 1 shows a summary of the major classifications of phases currently available and their applicability.
(1) L.R. Snyder, J.W. Dolan, and P.W. Carr, J. Chromatogr. A 1060, 77–116 (2004).
(2) L.R. Snyder, J.W. Dolan, and P.W. Carr, Anal. Chem. 79, 3255–3261 (2007).
Exploring Metabolite Alteration from Age-Related Macular Degeneration with UHPLC-MS/MS
February 19th 2025Exploring the alterations in metabolites of wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD), metabolomic analysis was performed on the aqueous humor of 30 patients with wAMD receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatments and 20 controls, via ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS).
The Next Frontier for Mass Spectrometry: Maximizing Ion Utilization
January 20th 2025In this podcast, Daniel DeBord, CTO of MOBILion Systems, describes a new high resolution mass spectrometry approach that promises to increase speed and sensitivity in omics applications. MOBILion recently introduced the PAMAF mode of operation, which stands for parallel accumulation with mobility aligned fragmentation. It substantially increases the fraction of ions used for mass spectrometry analysis by replacing the functionality of the quadrupole with high resolution ion mobility. Listen to learn more about this exciting new development.
Direct Analysis of Class 2 Residual Solvents Using Molecular Rotational Resonance Spectroscopy
February 19th 2025Molecular rotational resonance (MRR) spectroscopy operates in the microwave region, detecting transitions between pure rotational energy levels. Combined with adiabatic cooling, MRR produces highly selective spectra unique to each molecule’s atomic structure. Even slight changes in atomic position or mass result in distinct spectral differences, allowing MRR to directly analyze complex mixtures, including isomers, without chromatographic separation. This article presents a continuous headspace-MRR method for analyzing Class 2 residual solvents, including low-volatility solvents from Class 2 Mixture C. By evaluating solvents with diverse boiling points, the study demonstrates that MRR meets ICH and USP standards for most Class 2 and Class 3 solvents and half of Class 1 solvents.