Ask the Editor: Degassing
Q: We currently use a glass filtration setup attached to a pump using 0.45-?m membrane filters. The flask contains a magnetic stirrer. As the solution passes the membrane filter, gas bubbles appear on its surface. As soon as the solution has completely passed through the filter the vacuum pump is turned off and the solution is poured from this setup into another bottle and stoppered until use (up to 3?4 days time). The HPLC equipment has inline degassers that are routinely used. Besides filtering is this setup degassing? To effectively degas a solution should the solution remain under vacuum for a longer period than the time it takes to filter? Should we be using this setup to filter?degas HPLC-grade solvents or commercial mobile phases?
The following question and answer were posted on the Chromatography Forum website. The answer was provided by Tom Jupille of LC Resources/Separation Science Associates.
We currently use a glass filtration setup attached to a pump using 0.45-µm membrane filters. The flask contains a magnetic stirrer. As the solution passes the membrane filter, gas bubbles appear on its surface. As soon as the solution has completely passed through the filter the vacuum pump is turned off and the solution is poured from this setup into another bottle and stoppered until use (up to 3â4 days time). The HPLC equipment has inline degassers that are routinely used. Besides filtering is this setup degassing? To effectively degas a solution should the solution remain under vacuum for a longer period than the time it takes to filter?Should we be using this setup to filterâdegas HPLC-grade solvents or commercial mobile phases?
Is the setup degassing as well as filtering? Yes, to some extent. As for the efficacy of degassing a solution by filtration, it depends on what you mean by "effectively." The problem is that the solubility of air in binary mixtures of polar organics and water is lower than the average of the solubilities in either of the pure solvents. When you mix the solvents, the excess air comes out as bubbles.
In the case of premixed mobile phase, vacuum filtration is probably sufficient. All you have to do is to give the excess air (bubbles) a place to go. In the case of "on-line mixing," the job is a lot harder, because you have to get the dissolved air levels in each component down far enough that you will be below the saturation curve when you mix them. In any case, as soon as you expose the solvents to the atmosphere, they start to re-saturate.
Regarding the part of the question about filtering HPLC-grade solvents, they are typically filtered through 0.2-µm filters at the bottling point.
Questions?
LCGC technical editor Steve Brown will answer your technical questions. Each month, one question will be selected to appear in this space, so we welcome your submissions. Please send all questions to the attention of "Ask the Editor" at lcgcedit@lcgcmag.com We look forward to hearing from you.
AI and GenAI Applications to Help Optimize Purification and Yield of Antibodies From Plasma
October 31st 2024Deriving antibodies from plasma products involves several steps, typically starting from the collection of plasma and ending with the purification of the desired antibodies. These are: plasma collection; plasma pooling; fractionation; antibody purification; concentration and formulation; quality control; and packaging and storage. This process results in a purified antibody product that can be used for therapeutic purposes, diagnostic tests, or research. Each step is critical to ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of the final product. Applications of AI/GenAI in many of these steps can significantly help in the optimization of purification and yield of the desired antibodies. Some specific use-cases are: selecting and optimizing plasma units for optimized plasma pooling; GenAI solution for enterprise search on internal knowledge portal; analysing and optimizing production batch profitability, inventory, yields; monitoring production batch key performance indicators for outlier identification; monitoring production equipment to predict maintenance events; and reducing quality control laboratory testing turnaround time.
