The exact method used depends upon the type of hydrocarbon contamination in the soil.
A reader recently asked:
What chromatographic methods are used to analyze hydrocarbons in soil?
The exact method used depends upon the type of hydrocarbon contamination in the soil. Different chromatographic methods are used to analyze the volatile and semivolatile components of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in soil.
Volatiles - the gasoline range organics (GRO) - can be determined by purge-and-trap gas chromatography (GC) with flame ionization detection (FID). Semivolatiles, or diesel range organics (DRO), can be analyzed using an extraction procedure followed by GC-FID. Various extraction procedures can be used, including solvent extraction, Soxhlet extraction, solid-phase extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, sonication extraction, and microwave extraction. FID measures the total hydrocarbon content, and photoionization detection can be used to measure the aromatic compounds. GC with mass spectrometric detection also can be used.
According to LCGC's "GC Connections" editor John Hinshaw, "Laboratory analytical methods as well as field sampling techniques strongly influence volatile organic compound (VOC) selectivities and recoveries from soils. These GC sampling methodologies are the recognized, commonly used ones in the U.S.
"I would add a few more to the list: Equilibrium headspace sampling is a very good alternative to purge-and-trap for the volatile compounds. The amount of added solvents, including organic displacers, can be quite small, and recent headspace samplers have trapping options plus multiple sampling cycles per vial that significantly lower the method detection limits (MDL). Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) provides another means for transferring volatiles from the sample vial to the GC inlet. Another alternative is thermal desorption, which involves heating the soil to release the volatiles, usually in the absence of any additional solvents.
"Each analytical sampling method for GC has its own characteristics that influence the quality of results. Consideration of regulatory requirements along with careful testing and validation with a specific sample matrix and field sampling regimen is the best way to choose a particular methodology."
Questions?LCGC technical editor Steve Brown will answer your technical questions. Each month, one question will be selected to appear in this space, so we welcome your submissions. Please send all questions to the attention of "Ask the Editor" at lcgcedit@lcgcmag.com. We look forward to hearing from you.
Inside the Laboratory: The Richardson Group at the University of South Carolina
November 20th 2024In this edition of “Inside the Laboratory,” Susan Richardson of the University of South Carolina discusses her laboratory’s work with using electron ionization and chemical ionization with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) to detect DBPs in complex environmental matrices, and how her work advances environmental analysis.
RAFA 2024 Highlights: Contemporary Food Contamination Analysis Using Chromatography
November 18th 2024A series of lectures focusing on emerging analytical techniques used to analyse food contamination took place on Wednesday 6 November 2024 at RAFA 2024 in Prague, Czech Republic. The session included new approaches for analysing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polychlorinated alkanes (PCAS), Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons (MOH), and short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs and MCCPs).
Pharmaceutical excipients, such as polyethylene glycol-based polymers, must be tested for the presence of ethylene oxide (EtO) and 1,4-dioxane as part of a safety assessment, according to USP Chapter <228>.