Among the compounds of concern found in the samples were nicotine-related alkaloids, psychoactive cannabinoids, and chemicals that promoted inflammation of the respiratory system.
A new study in the Journal of Chromatography A attempts to demystify some of the health advantages marketed by the electronic cigarette industry in comparison to the risks of conventional cigarettes, using gas chromatography coupled to a time-of-flight mass spectrometer (GC–TOF-MS) to build an electron ionization mass spectra (EI-MS) database of more than 250 chemicals classified as either volatile or semi-volatile compounds (1). Given that the chemicals were identified with varying levels of confidence, an additional layer of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis was performed to confirm what was found.
Authored by three researchers in the Department of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences at the Research Institute on Chemical and Biological Analysis, headquartered at the Universidade de Santiago de Compostela in Spain, this report aimed to improve upon prior gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) detection that is considered the popular standard for analysis of so-called “e-liquids” (1). The authors said that both LC–MS and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy have been proposed for the determination of whole families of compounds and the quantitation of major flavors, but that prior to their research, only approximately 140 volatile compounds had been identified.
Certain compounds produced by the combustion of tobacco in conventional cigarettes—tar and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) among them—are not present in the smoking of e-cigarettes, contributing to e-cigarettes’ reputation as a “safe” alternative (1). But the researchers list numerous factors and symptoms in this study that have indicated lung issues in consumers, from flavors that may cause oxidative stress to the reactions between carbonyls and alcohols that produce acetals, which are known respiratory irritants. These concerns also say nothing of addictive substances commonly found in electronic smoking devices, primarily nicotine and cannabinoids.
For this experiment, the research team sought a nontargeted approach, for the purposes of which they analyzed the e-liquids using two capillary columns with different polarities (1). The complementary LC–MS analysis was reserved for compounds that were identified at the highest of three levels of confidence, having satisfied three identification criteria. For these, the researchers used different combinations of chromatographic gradients and mass spectrometry (MS) instruments depending on whether they were seeking further information about cannabinoids or acetals of aldehydes. Study results showed that while concentration ratios between delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in e-liquids fell into a relatively narrow range between 0.02% and 0.3%, the ratio of propylene glycol acetals to parent aldehydes ranged from 2%, for ethyl vanillin, to upwards of 80% for benzaldehyde.
While the findings of the study opened a pathway to the discovery of more volatile and semi-volatile compounds in electronic cigarettes than ever before, the authors recommended further research, for multiple reasons. They believe that more efforts should be undertaken to characterize the composition of vaporized fractions of chemicals, in part to identify the transformation or degradation processes these compounds undergo during e-smoking (1). But most of all, given the potential for damaging health effects in many of the compounds, determination of their percentages to which humans are exposed by consumption remains a crucial area of need.
(1) Cobo Golpe, M.; Ramil, M.; Rodríguez, I. Comprehensive characterization of volatile and semi-volatile compounds in e-liquids for electronic cigarette using gas chromatography accurate mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2023, 1703, 464114. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464114
Inside the Laboratory: The Richardson Group at the University of South Carolina
November 20th 2024In this edition of “Inside the Laboratory,” Susan Richardson of the University of South Carolina discusses her laboratory’s work with using electron ionization and chemical ionization with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) to detect DBPs in complex environmental matrices, and how her work advances environmental analysis.
RAFA 2024 Highlights: Cutting-Edge Chromatography Techniques for Food Safety and Food Analysis
November 18th 2024An illuminating session focusing on progress in analytical techniques used in food analysis took place on Wednesday 6 November 2024 at RAFA 2024 in Prague, The Czech Republic, including a talk on the analysis of 1000 toxins in 10 minutes.
RAFA 2024 Highlights: Contemporary Food Contamination Analysis Using Chromatography
November 18th 2024A series of lectures focusing on emerging analytical techniques used to analyse food contamination took place on Wednesday 6 November 2024 at RAFA 2024 in Prague, Czech Republic. The session included new approaches for analysing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), polychlorinated alkanes (PCAS), Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons (MOH), and short- and medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs and MCCPs).